Net 1.1 and 2.0 and SQLServer 2000 and 2005 at one machine

Hi,
we have a VServer with Server 2003.
I'd like to install Software for net 1.1, 2.0 and also SQLServer 2000 and
2005 on it.
Does anybody knows if that's possible without problems. I have a consultant
here (from cognos) who tells me it's not possible. Can't believe that.
Please help.
Thanks,
Uli
--
Wer nicht fragt, stirbt dumm.
If you don''t ask, you''ll die as a dumba**.Hello Uli,
I've certainly done 2000 and 2005 on the same physical host before without
implications (other than competing for memory, cpu, etc.) I'm not sure about
Virtual Server, but I can't tell you why it would be any different. Is the
consultant offering any specifics?
Thanks,
Kent Tegels
http://staff.develop.com/ktegels/|||No.
Only not to run 2000 and 2005 on one system.
But we will go on and try with both on one system.
Thanks a lot.
Uli
--
Wer nicht fragt, stirbt dumm.
If you don''''t ask, you''''ll die as a dumba**.
"Kent Tegels" wrote:
> Hello Uli,
> I've certainly done 2000 and 2005 on the same physical host before without
> implications (other than competing for memory, cpu, etc.) I'm not sure about
> Virtual Server, but I can't tell you why it would be any different. Is the
> consultant offering any specifics?
> Thanks,
> Kent Tegels
> http://staff.develop.com/ktegels/
>
>|||Uli formulated the question :
> Hi,
> we have a VServer with Server 2003.
> I'd like to install Software for net 1.1, 2.0 and also SQLServer 2000 and
> 2005 on it.
> Does anybody knows if that's possible without problems. I have a consultant
> here (from cognos) who tells me it's not possible. Can't believe that.
> Please help.
> Thanks,
> Uli
funny you should ask
I am doing exactly what you want to do
be it that I use VirtualPC cause I am still in test
so far everything is working fine
grtz|||Hi Uli
By requiring .NET Framework 1.1 implies the server is doing more than just
run SQL Server. As Kent says running SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 on a single system
works if you have enough resources, also having both frameworks is possible
see http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/06/03/CLRInsideOut/default.aspx,
which implies that if this can't be done the problem is elsewhere or does not
exist!
John
"Uli" wrote:
> No.
> Only not to run 2000 and 2005 on one system.
> But we will go on and try with both on one system.
> Thanks a lot.
> Uli
> --
> Wer nicht fragt, stirbt dumm.
> If you don''''t ask, you''''ll die as a dumba**.
>
> "Kent Tegels" wrote:
> > Hello Uli,
> >
> > I've certainly done 2000 and 2005 on the same physical host before without
> > implications (other than competing for memory, cpu, etc.) I'm not sure about
> > Virtual Server, but I can't tell you why it would be any different. Is the
> > consultant offering any specifics?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kent Tegels
> > http://staff.develop.com/ktegels/
> >
> >
> >