I've posed this before, but never seem to get a concrete answer:
1) Is a Network Appliance NetApp 940 Filer connected via a fiber card
running iSCSI supported by MS for SQL 2000 implementations?
2) Does anyone run a similar configuration and run into problems?
Thanks everyone
1) A snip from the KB below
Windows Hardware Quality Lab (WHQL) Qualified Devices
Microsoft Windows servers and networked servers or NAS storage servers that
are Windows Hardware Quality Lab (WHQL) certified automatically meet the
data write ordering and write-through guarantees required to support a SQL
Server storage device. Microsoft supports both application and
storage-related issues in these configurations.
Other Devices
If you use a non-WHQL qualified storage device with SQL Server that supports
the I/O guarantees for transactional database use described in this article,
Microsoft will provide full support for SQL Server and SQL Server-based
applications.
INF: Support for Network Database Files
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=304261
You can check the status of the exact model here
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/catalog/server/
HTH
Jasper Smith (SQL Server MVP)
http://www.sqldbatips.com
I support PASS - the definitive, global
community for SQL Server professionals -
http://www.sqlpass.org
"Gary Klohouse" <fastman@.earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:OfDHJUjfEHA.2812@.tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've posed this before, but never seem to get a concrete answer:
> 1) Is a Network Appliance NetApp 940 Filer connected via a fiber card
> running iSCSI supported by MS for SQL 2000 implementations?
> 2) Does anyone run a similar configuration and run into problems?
> Thanks everyone
>
|||they are not great with Sequential Reads.
We use a NetApp filer and are not totally satisfied.
we are moving off to a Hitachi SAN.
Cheers,
Greg Jackson
PDX, Oregon
|||What is happen?
"Gary Klohouse" wrote:
> I've posed this before, but never seem to get a concrete answer:
> 1) Is a Network Appliance NetApp 940 Filer connected via a fiber card
> running iSCSI supported by MS for SQL 2000 implementations?
> 2) Does anyone run a similar configuration and run into problems?
> Thanks everyone
>
>
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment